PT3 vs HEM on CEREUS

Experiencing technical difficulties? Think you've found a problem with PokerTracker 3? Report it here.

Moderator: Moderators

Re: PT3 vs HEM on CEREUS

Postby eryanb » Sat Jan 08, 2011 6:54 am

Ok done. Support ticket is in with the 4 HH files containing the 29 hands. In the "Rake" column in the "Sessions" tab I see $1.15 rake paid. Under "Rake" in "Session" in HEM I see $3.17 rake paid. Hope this helps.
eryanb
 
Posts: 57
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2008 1:18 pm

Re: PT3 vs HEM on CEREUS

Postby WhiteRider » Sat Jan 08, 2011 7:28 am

That's great - thanks. If you didn't include a link to this thread in your ticket please do, or post the ticket number here and I'll sort it out.
WhiteRider
Moderator
 
Posts: 54017
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 7:06 pm
Location: UK

Re: PT3 vs HEM on CEREUS

Postby eryanb » Sat Jan 08, 2011 7:31 am

[103219]
eryanb
 
Posts: 57
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2008 1:18 pm

Re: PT3 vs HEM on CEREUS

Postby WhiteRider » Sat Jan 08, 2011 10:37 am

Thanks - I've moved it to my inbox and I'll check it out.
WhiteRider
Moderator
 
Posts: 54017
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 7:06 pm
Location: UK

Re: PT3 vs HEM on CEREUS

Postby eryanb » Sat Jan 08, 2011 5:41 pm

So it probably is a contributed calculation I'm looking at on HEM and it's much higher lately because I've been getting creamed since September...which also explains why I'm so grumpy. Thanks for checking this out.
eryanb
 
Posts: 57
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2008 1:18 pm

Re: PT3 vs HEM on CEREUS

Postby tarix » Sat Jan 08, 2011 10:16 pm

Thanks for taking the time to give us all of these examples. I think most of the time errors like this persist just because we don't get enough actionable reports on the errors.
tarix
Developer
 
Posts: 3760
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 2:49 pm

Re: PT3 vs HEM on CEREUS

Postby zubs1aa » Sun Jan 09, 2011 2:18 am

eryan-

instead of beefing with the PT3 guys about the cereus HH problem, why aren't you reporting the problem to cereus that they are writing crappy HH files?
zubs1aa
 
Posts: 2219
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2008 1:52 pm

Re: PT3 vs HEM on CEREUS

Postby eryanb » Sun Jan 09, 2011 3:04 am

zubs1aa wrote:eryan-

instead of beefing with the PT3 guys about the cereus HH problem, why aren't you reporting the problem to cereus that they are writing crappy HH files?


Well because the error message provided said "invalid pot size" which was misleading. I didn't write the software so I have no way to know that seating list can cause this error. I made this thread...now we know. Also since HEM had no problems I assume it's an easy fix. I admit I came across confrontational a bit, but HEM does always seem to be right on top of all these little things and my guard was up from the CAKE issues last year.
eryanb
 
Posts: 57
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2008 1:18 pm

Re: PT3 vs HEM on CEREUS

Postby zubs1aa » Sun Jan 09, 2011 3:07 am

eryanb wrote:
zubs1aa wrote:eryan-

instead of beefing with the PT3 guys about the cereus HH problem, why aren't you reporting the problem to cereus that they are writing crappy HH files?


Well because the error message provided said "invalid pot size" which was misleading. I didn't write the software so I have no way to know that seating list can cause this error. I made this thread...now we know. Also since HEM had no problems I assume it's an easy fix. I admit I came across confrontational a bit, but HEM does always seem to be right on top of all these little things and my guard was up from the CAKE issues last year.


I for one don't want my HH getting "fixed" when it involves creating new stack info and what not. If it was PT doing a workaround for something silly in a format or what not than I am all for it. But I def don't want gameplay data messed with.

THat's why I tossed it back to you....
zubs1aa
 
Posts: 2219
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2008 1:52 pm

Previous

Return to Technical Support / Bug Reports [Read Only]

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests

cron