PokerTracker

Hi,

I have noticed thanks to a PT3 report that the fold to R float bet of my opponents is significantly higher than their fold to R Cbet (60% vs 38%). I find it reaaally surprising (especially the 60%), so could you please tell me if the folowing definitions of these two stats are ok?

fold to R float bet: the player cbet flop & turn, checks on the river and folds if the opponent bets on the river.

fold to R Cbet: the player check-call or call prefop, on flop & turn, then check-fold or fold on river.

Thank you for reading (and replying )

I'm not aware of any problems with those stats.
It could be related to the number of opportunities - if 60% is 3/5 then it would only take one different action to make that 40% (2/5) for example.

However, it could be because of the type of actions involved. If a player CBets the flop and turn and then checks the river I guess they'll fold fairly often, especially if the opponent only bets when the board is scary. If a player has called both flop and turn CBets then I guess they will fold the river less often.

Thank you for your answer. The number of opportunities is high (hundreds of opportunities for each stat) so it is probably because of "the type of actions involved"

Hi,

I had a look at these two stats:
- Fold to R Float Bet
- Fold to Flop Float Bet

I have noticed that the expressions for "cnt_r_float_def_action_fold" and "cnt_f_float_def_opp_action_fold" are significantly different. Is that normal?

I don't see "cnt_f_float_def_opp_action_fold" - is that a custom column?

No. It is the numerator in the value expression of "Fold to Flop Float Bet"
((cnt_f_float_def_opp_action_fold / cnt_f_float_def_opp) * 100).

Ah - I see what you mean.
Strictly speaking you can only make a "float" bet after calling a continuation bet on the previous street. Since this isn't possible for the flop (because there was no previous street to face a continuation bet) the database doesn't store a field for flop float bets. Therefore we need to define the situation in other ways, which is why the flop expression is more complex.