should we have multiple databases?

General discussion of PokerTracker 3.

Moderator: Moderators

should we have multiple databases?

Postby omaha » Thu Mar 06, 2008 6:22 pm

I data mine quite heavily, so have very large database.

My main problem is the amount of time it takes to cluster and analyse a large database.

Am I am high best to start multiple databases at each site?

If so, is it possible to have the hands automatically placed into the correct database? Also, can we separate six Max from full ring?
omaha
 
Posts: 215
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 8:39 pm

Re: should we have multiple databases?

Postby APerfect10 » Thu Mar 06, 2008 7:11 pm

** Moved to PokerTracker 3 - General Forum **

I would recommend only have two databases. One for observed hand histories and one for played hands. I would not separate them by site, at least played hands. You could separate observed hands by site...

I definitely would not separate them by limit.

FWIW, Importing on a site by site basis is currently not supported. Once enabled, under your site configuration tab in the Auto Import window, you would need to check 'Override Defaults' then select the appropriate database(s).

Best regards,

Derek
APerfect10
Site Admin
 
Posts: 4465
Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2007 6:03 pm

Re: should we have multiple databases?

Postby _dave_ » Thu Mar 06, 2008 8:49 pm

FWIW, you will greatly decrease your clustering time (and speed up most every other aspect too) if you purchase a new hard disk (or re-task an existing one), create a partition big enough to hold all your database (at least 3* expected max size) and use the TABLESPACE trick to store the database on it. Do not put any other data on this partition, only pg_data.
_dave_
 
Posts: 1147
Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2007 6:19 pm

Re: should we have multiple databases?

Postby Qaarc » Sat Mar 08, 2008 8:44 am

sorry to hijack this thread ... but it was mentioned here

Can I export using the following creteria

One for observed hand histories and one for played hands

I have combined them, beforing understand the implications and now hope fully want to seperate them
Qaarc
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 1:25 pm

Re: should we have multiple databases?

Postby Josh » Sat Mar 08, 2008 10:23 am

There's no way to selectively purge or export right now, though this is coming.
Josh
Site Admin
 
Posts: 6222
Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2007 6:03 pm

Re: should we have multiple databases?

Postby Qaarc » Sat Mar 08, 2008 12:32 pm

is this functionality in PT2?

I will just wait till it is available. Thank you.
Qaarc
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 1:25 pm

Re: should we have multiple databases?

Postby Josh » Sat Mar 08, 2008 12:41 pm

Yes, you can selectively export/purge from PT2.
Josh
Site Admin
 
Posts: 6222
Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2007 6:03 pm

Re: should we have multiple databases?

Postby omaha » Sat Mar 08, 2008 9:59 pm

What is the TABLESPACE trick?

I have just bought a new drive, and will be configuring it as above! Great minds must think alike!
omaha
 
Posts: 215
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 8:39 pm

Re: should we have multiple databases?

Postby _dave_ » Sat Mar 08, 2008 10:48 pm

it is in the general/PostgresQL forum, OP by me. EDIT: OP not by me, link here: viewtopic.php?f=17&t=526

most important is to make a TABLESPACE on a partition all of it's own, so no other windows cruft gets in the way of the database filesystem.
_dave_
 
Posts: 1147
Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2007 6:19 pm

Re: should we have multiple databases?

Postby omaha » Sun Mar 09, 2008 1:53 am

Thanks, i tried it, but cant get my folder to be shared. I am using xp, have posted more info in your linky
omaha
 
Posts: 215
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 8:39 pm


Return to General [Read Only]

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 43 guests

cron
highfalutin