PokerTracker

I've filtered my PF all-ins that have 79%-82% equity to see how I have been running
over all 6 sites, 1.8 million hands. It's says I'm 26 buy-ins below expectation. However when I calculate times lost
I'm losing 22% of the time, how is that I am running at expectation mathematically but way below expectation
financially???
When I filter present site I'm playing and it shows that I'm losing 20%, great, but down 4 buy-ins, this is over just
202 all-ins, will this EV rise even though I'm not losing mathematically??

You can be below expectation in money but on expectation in wins when you happen to win the smaller pots and lose the bigger pots.

Past performance is not a predictor of future results. You cannot presume because you ran bad before you will later run good -- for more on this, please see this wikipedia article.

Past performance is not a predictor of future results. You cannot presume because you ran bad before you will later run good -- for more on this, please see this wikipedia article.[/quote]

I filtered all hands with 80bbs+ contributed and I'm 1000bbs below EV. I'd expect it to be closer then 10 buy-ins.
Filtered less then 40bbs and that showed 0EV(-20bbs). Understand my confusion?

The ones that run bad can run bad for a lifetime and vice versa, well known fact.

So I can sassume I'm one of the" not so lucky" types and PT4 confirms this if math used is accurate.
Being down 26 buy-ins below EV over 4 years isn't much, but tells me to stick to the micros and see
if luck fatctor switches before attepting to go back to the 200$. If never, then I'll always play
micros as it's just a past time for me. Not a dreamer,

There is no such thing as a "not so lucky type" either -- because you haven't run well in big pots means absolutely nothing when it comes to the future.