kraada wrote:There is actually nothing left of the old system to convert. However, the process of updating the databases is now made much easier with our new system - please see the new
Tutorial: Tournament Auto Detection for details on how to utilize the new system. It should not take long to get things back to a very similar state to what you had previously.
I've looked at the tutorial but I still don't understand what is the best thing to do about all my 'lost' tournament types.
Are you saying:
it is not possible to recover my scores of hours of painstakingly selected tournament types; but I don't NEED to do that, because PT can now 're-detect' the tournament types automatically?Are you, in a sense, saying:
I've wasted all that time manually entering tournament data, because PT can now do it automatically, and accurately?![Confused :?](https://www.pokertracker.com/phpBB3-forums/images/smilies/icon_e_confused.gif)
Or have I misunderstood?
If that
is what you are saying, well, I'm a little skeptical about letting PT run loose on all my existing data. Please let me elaborate...
![Geek :geek:](https://www.pokertracker.com/phpBB3-forums/images/smilies/icon_e_geek.gif)
After a typical day/week of tourneys, I would import a batch of HHs into PT and go through all my new tourneys in the
Enter Tournament Results dialogue.
1. PT used to get loads of the buy-ins wrong. (For example: I play a large volume of $21.50+1.50, $43+4, $64+6 and $160+12 tournaments on PartyPoker. However PT used to 'guess' the buy-ins to be $20+3, $40+7, $70+0, and $100+72 (lol) respectively. Granted, the hand histories just indicated the total buy-ins of $23 / $47 / $70 / $172, so I can understand that PT had to 'guess'.)
So
my first concern is that if I let PT 're-detect' all my tourneys, all my tourney buy-ins will be un-corrected again - hours and hours of work lost?!
2. Further, I manually classified all my tourneys, for example as
6-Max Rebuy,
Rebuy Satellite etc... Now, in principle I welcome the revised system (no need for people to create their own tourney types). But I simply don't understand how PT is going to 'recover' all my
hours and hours and hours and hours of work, where I set the tourneys types manually? (and with 100% accuracy!!)
For example, can PT now actually detect whether my $25+2.50 iPoker rebuy tourneys were six-max or ten-max?
Can PT now recognise a $47 PartyPoker satellite and classify it as a $43+4
Turbo Satellite versus a $43+4
Satellite?
I've looked at the tutorial you linked to, but I simply don't see how PT is going to guess all the tourney types correctly? TBH some of the classifications are a bit subjective anyway (e.g. I somewhat arbitrarily decided to put 'speed rebuy sats' and 'speed sats' under the same classification of 'speed sats', rather than have an excessive number of sub-classifications).
3. And can you guarantee me that this auto-update process won't 'lose' my manually-entered tournament data, such as number of entrants, finishing positions, and number of rebuys/addons? PT has a history of obliterating this data, particularly for Party tourneys, where I re-import hand histories for already-imported tourneys.
For example, wherever I imported the final HH for a given Party tourney (which included the line 'Hero_Screen_Name has finished in
Xth place'), if I had
already imported that tourney before, and had already entered my number of rebuys/addons, PT would actually reset my rebuys/addons to zero upon re-importing that HH!
Re point 2: isn't there some SQL command I can run to search for all tourneys with the 'old tourney type' of X, and change them to a certain corresponding tourney type under the new system? That way, I could be sure that all my existing tourneys were classified with 100% accuracy.
I have thousands upon thousands of tourneys in my database, and although it was extremely tedious that I used to have to select all the tourney types manually, at least I've done all the hard work now, and got it 100% right.
Please advise!
![Confused :?](https://www.pokertracker.com/phpBB3-forums/images/smilies/icon_e_confused.gif)
I'm not change-averse - I honestly do welcome the new system! - I'm just concerned that I might have lost a
vast amount of prior work.