I would like to compare how player defense rates adapts against under- vs oversized river probe bets.
Tried to adapt cnt_r_probe_def_action_call column as below:
- Code: Select all
sum(if[cash_hand_player_statistics.amt_r_bet_facing > 0 and
cash_hand_player_statistics.flg_t_cbet_opp and
lookup_actions_t.action = 'X' and
not(cash_hand_player_statistics.flg_r_open_opp) and
lookup_actions_r.action LIKE 'C%' and
val_r_bet_size < 6, 1, 0])
The same adaptation worked well with cnt_r_float_def_action_call and cnt_r_donk_def_action call but not here. Could you explain please?
BTW which is the difference here between val_r_bet_size and val_r_2bet_size, I mean in a river probe bet situation?
May be this might be replaced by
which is defined ascash_hand_player_statistics.val_r_bet_made_pct
but this is not clear in my mind.Percentage of pot this player bet on river
Let's say pot is 100 and player A probe bets 50, hence player B has 50 to put in a 150 pot.
So here which is the value of cash_hand_player_statistics.val_r_bet_made_pct for player B?