PokerTracker

I wanted to build a autonote that counts how many times a player 3bet an isoraise, so I made this 2 autonote



and



but clearly something isn't working as expecting since I'm getty way less result for the first stat.

I made the relative custom stat using these columns:
_3Bet_Iso

Code: Select all

sum(if[char_length(cash_hand_summary.str_aggressors_p) >= 2 and char_length(cash_hand_summary.str_actors_p) >= 1 and substring(cash_hand_summary.str_aggressors_p from 2 for 1)::int != substring(cash_hand_summary.str_actors_p from 1 for 1)::int AND cash_hand_player_statistics.flg_p_3bet,1,0])

_3Bet_Iso_opp

Code: Select all

sum(if[char_length(cash_hand_summary.str_aggressors_p) >= 2 and char_length(cash_hand_summary.str_actors_p) >= 1 and substring(cash_hand_summary.str_aggressors_p from 2 for 1)::int != substring(cash_hand_summary.str_actors_p from 1 for 1)::int AND cash_hand_player_statistics.flg_p_3bet_opp,1,0])

Now let's compare the 2 stats (the simple custom stat and the one made with custom notes)



as you can see the numerator and denominator are different




I just want to point out that these method is working for other stats like 3bets, so there's something wrong with the autonote definition



Well I guess I realized one of the problems... the issue with the numerator.
If I made a hand report and using a proper filter, I realized that the 6 hands are the hands which we see a showdown. The problem is, I didn't ask to notetaker to filter that.

http://i.imgur.com/RVHrnSZ.png

Regarding the denominator, I don't have a clue about the difference, maybe there's some spot that wasn't qualified...

Is this a bug tho?

UPDATE:

I just made a brand new autonote (not duplicate from the other one) and I called it P003



Now let's compare the test for the buggy stat and the new stat

http://i.imgur.com/NdjKNnU.png

lol? The same note yield different results?

I also check the autonote for the opportunities, and I got now strange behaviour.
The only issue is the different number of opportunities that are showing up. I'd like to check what is wrong with the note but I don't know how I can do that

I'm not sure why you're getting so few hits. Try creating it without using Opponent - you can filter to make sure that someone limped via Hand Details -> Preflop Limping That Occurred. Set that to >= 1 and then there must have been some limp and that takes care of your reason for needing an Opponent.

kraada wrote:I'm not sure why you're getting so few hits. Try creating it without using Opponent - you can filter to make sure that someone limped via Hand Details -> Preflop Limping That Occurred. Set that to >= 1 and then there must have been some limp and that takes care of your reason for needing an Opponent.

In case you missed, I figure it out in my second post... still a bug tho.
Do you have any insights regarding the denominator?

Try creating another note for the denominator without ()s in it and let me know if that works better. It's kind of a shot in the dark but the only thing I can see that's different between the one you posted that didn't work and the one you posted that did.

kraada wrote:Try creating another note for the denominator without ()s in it and let me know if that works better. It's kind of a shot in the dark but the only thing I can see that's different between the one you posted that didn't work and the one you posted that did.

It's not that... Now I know what it is all about.
The buggy note was a duplicate of this one


As you can see, there's a variable in it.
Well I found that the buggy note, even if it doesn't contain the variable in the string, it somewhat stored in the code...

Look what I've highlighted
http://i.imgur.com/p8D6GHB.png

so it was embedded in the stat once I hit the duplicate button

Thanks for following up. We're aware of that restriction with Variables and I have reminded the development team about it for you.