3bet v Hero statistic

[rki122]

HI.
I have been watching some trainning videos and the instructor showed a statistic in his HEM2 HUD which showed the following statistics and I was wondering if it is possible to have these made for PT4 HUD

Stats in question are;
Total number of times opponent 3bets V hero (So how many times % he 3bets V just my open Bet rather than in general)
and
Total number of time villian folds to Hero 3bet (So not just how many times % they fold to 3bet in general but just to my 3bet)

I have looked around the statistics that are avialble in PT4 HUD but cannot see any that fit this.
Would it be possible to add these stats in?

Kind Regards
Richard

[kraada]

These stats are not included in PT4. For our reasoning, please see this blog post.

[flangmann]

I disagree with the article. It only shows that you have to be careful how to interpret vs Hero stats. But you should not try to "protect us" from misinterpreting stats. you can easily put a sample size next to all the vs hero stats, to make them a very helpful tool if you have enough sample.
Every High stakes player plays against the same Regs all the time and it is easy to get a 20k+ sample on them. Also Raise first in stats vs Hero in BB or Hero on CO can be important and it is easier to get the sample.

Please dont be so lazy to not include vs Hero stats.
As far as I know vs hero stats are the best argument for HM2.

[flangmann]

just found this quote in another thread to the topic:

It would be a pretty major change and it can be detrimental for non-heads up players so I would not expect to see this feature pursued anytime in the near future.

sounds like it was too complicated to implement, so you looked for excuses that you "made a conscious decision".
Because for HU players it would be a huge help obviously.

I think you should put it back on your TODO list.

[rki122]

These stats are not included in PT4. For our reasoning, please see this blog post.

Well that's a shame, hopefully you may change your mind in time, as the competition has it, so I would have expected you may too.