Discuss how to create custom stats, reports and HUD profiles and share your creations.
Moderators: WhiteRider, kraada, Flag_Hippo, morny, Moderators
-
scape
-
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 5:39 pm
by kraada » Sat Jan 11, 2014 2:09 pm
It's not inaccurate, just incomplete. When in the big blind and you get a walk your effective stack is treated as 0 because you could never have lost any money in those hands -- you never had a chance to act, and effective stack is based on how much you can lose at your first action.
-
kraada
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 54431
- Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2008 2:32 am
- Location: NY
by scape » Sat Jan 11, 2014 2:56 pm
So if I filter for effective stacks 0,1-30 that will filter out all the non showdown winnings when I get a walk from the big blind. That still does not explain how the showdown winnings an the EV adjusted winning are totally different?
-
scape
-
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 5:39 pm
by kraada » Sat Jan 11, 2014 3:01 pm
The showdown winnings look the same to me, just the scales are different from the two graphs. A filter for just effective stack of something like 0.1 BB to 100BB or something similar shouldn't affect adjusted results though.
-
kraada
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 54431
- Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2008 2:32 am
- Location: NY
by scape » Sat Jan 11, 2014 3:56 pm
Yes the Ev shows -6000 on one graph and +8000 on the other. So how do I do to analyze my game from the big blind and the small blind at different effective stack sizes when Im not confident that the graph I see is correct?
-
scape
-
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 5:39 pm
by kraada » Sun Jan 12, 2014 9:37 am
I'm certain they're correct, I'm just not certain exactly what is happening here.
Add a filter to the basic graph for "went to showdown" and compare that with the effective stack version with a "went to showdown" filter also enabled. Do you still see a discrepancy then?
-
kraada
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 54431
- Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2008 2:32 am
- Location: NY
by scape » Sun Jan 12, 2014 11:18 am
No it shows no discrepancy.
-
scape
-
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 5:39 pm
by kraada » Sun Jan 12, 2014 11:24 am
I responded in the other thread -- let's try to keep it to one thread so that I don't get confused
-
kraada
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 54431
- Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2008 2:32 am
- Location: NY
Return to Custom Stats, Reports and HUD Profiles
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests