1/2 pot CB w/ FD, pot sized CB w/ TPTK, etc.

Discuss and learn how to use TableTracker for table selection and NoteTracker for taking automated notes.

Moderators: WhiteRider, kraada, Flag_Hippo, morny, Moderators

Re: 1/2 pot CB w/ FD, pot sized CB w/ TPTK, etc.

Postby kraada » Tue Feb 11, 2014 6:16 pm

You've still got a couple of Any Street filters in there that you want to fix. Separating textures is a pretty complicated topic and is going to depend on your opposition and game type.
kraada
Moderator
 
Posts: 54431
Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2008 2:32 am
Location: NY

Re: 1/2 pot CB w/ FD, pot sized CB w/ TPTK, etc.

Postby dutch81 » Tue Feb 11, 2014 6:40 pm

Yes, I left some ANY st. filters in there for hands like quads and straight flushes where it's unlikely to be flopped, so I included those hands for any streets to note the times the villain turns or rivers it. Is this ok?

As for the type of game I usually play, small-mid stakes NLHE MTTs.
dutch81
 
Posts: 336
Joined: Wed May 29, 2013 12:33 pm

Re: 1/2 pot CB w/ FD, pot sized CB w/ TPTK, etc.

Postby kraada » Wed Feb 12, 2014 9:25 am

I just wanted to make sure you were aware of it and hadn't missed them. Because as it is now if someone flops and open ended straight flush draw and hits the straight flush later, it will count. Or has just a pocket pair and makes running quads.

I'm afraid I don't know MTTs that well so I really can't in good conscience help you divide textures in a way that makes sense for MTTs.
kraada
Moderator
 
Posts: 54431
Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2008 2:32 am
Location: NY

Re: 1/2 pot CB w/ FD, pot sized CB w/ TPTK, etc.

Postby dutch81 » Sat Feb 15, 2014 11:17 am

Ok, that makes sense...

what do you think of this filter for 1/2 pot CB's w/ any FD on flop?
Attachments
Screen shot 2014-02-15 at 10.14.11 AM.png
Screen shot 2014-02-15 at 10.13.42 AM.png
dutch81
 
Posts: 336
Joined: Wed May 29, 2013 12:33 pm

Re: 1/2 pot CB w/ FD, pot sized CB w/ TPTK, etc.

Postby dutch81 » Sat Feb 15, 2014 11:21 am

I took out one of the "use any hole cards" filter.
Attachments
Screen shot 2014-02-15 at 10.20.05 AM.png
dutch81
 
Posts: 336
Joined: Wed May 29, 2013 12:33 pm

Re: 1/2 pot CB w/ FD, pot sized CB w/ TPTK, etc.

Postby WhiteRider » Sat Feb 15, 2014 12:19 pm

That looks fine.
WhiteRider
Moderator
 
Posts: 54017
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 7:06 pm
Location: UK

Re: 1/2 pot CB w/ FD, pot sized CB w/ TPTK, etc.

Postby dutch81 » Sun Feb 16, 2014 1:11 am

Thank you sir, much appreciated,
dutch81
 
Posts: 336
Joined: Wed May 29, 2013 12:33 pm

Re: 1/2 pot CB w/ FD, pot sized CB w/ TPTK, etc.

Postby pasita » Sun Feb 23, 2014 4:35 pm

kraada wrote:202 - Called Two Half Pot or Greater Barrels w/ Draw (FD/OESD)

To see how you can look at pot size related considerations.


BTW went in to look. The relevant filter says NOT(Made one pair on flop using one hole card any pair).
1) Why is turn hand strength not included?
2) Won't the filter actually trigger even if I make , say trips or a straight on the flop and have draws to higher hands? Or does the "made one pair" somehow eclude higher made hands?
pasita
 
Posts: 605
Joined: Tue May 06, 2008 4:05 pm

Re: 1/2 pot CB w/ FD, pot sized CB w/ TPTK, etc.

Postby kraada » Mon Feb 24, 2014 8:57 am

(1) It is. Click Player to see all of the filters, it's there in the bigger conjunction.

(2) It will if you also make the calls of those bets.
kraada
Moderator
 
Posts: 54431
Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2008 2:32 am
Location: NY

Re: 1/2 pot CB w/ FD, pot sized CB w/ TPTK, etc.

Postby pasita » Mon Feb 24, 2014 3:27 pm

20140224205616.png
1) I only see turn draw strength in the filters, nothing about made hands. Am I missing something here?

2) I assume your answer "It will" was about "trigger", not "exlude" (sorry for making two questions in a row)? The note would make very little sense then, IMHO. From the name and a cursory glance, one might think this is a note for "this fish calls barrels with weak draws, no made hand, easy to barrel off." Actually he may be calling with top set or nut straight also, i.e. pretty much the exact opposite. The 1 pair constraint alone seems a bit out of place.
pasita
 
Posts: 605
Joined: Tue May 06, 2008 4:05 pm

PreviousNext

Return to TableTracker & NoteTracker

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests

cron